Sunday, April 30, 2006

Dreams

Recently, I have been dreaming a lot in my sleep. Usually they revolved around the same things but at the wrong places. I will list three examples. One is a dream where I was studying Mathematics in NUS...but my classmates turned out to be my army friends. The second is the reverse, where I dreamt of doing some army-related training but these time, the ones besides me are either my NHSS friends or NUS friends....funny dreams huh.

The third dream was something different from the rest. It is something I started having ever since I entered Guards (or sometime around there..can't actually remember). It is not ready the same dream but yet how should I describe? The dream seem to be a story and proceed like what you experience in daily life. However whenever I woke up, I can't seem to recall what happen in the dreams other then just a sense of awareness that this is the dream that I had. Sound spooky...huh.

I can't really say if this third dream is good or bad, although there is a sense of emptiness in me whenever I had the dream. Sometimes, I start thinking if I am dreaming now and the so called "dreams" I had is actually reality. This brings to a question: how do you differentiate dreams and reality? Perhaps it is a matter of choice. Maybe the dream I had is actually reality and maybe I am now dreaming and dreaming of writing this blog.

This is starting to sound a bit... Is this a sign of some mental illness? Anyway I should turn in now. Tomorrow when I wake up, I need to start reading on Lebesgue and abstract measure. My exam on 2 May will cover Algebra topics up to Galois theory and Royden book up to abstract measure theory.

Hopefully, tonight will be dreamless sleep. :)

Monday, April 17, 2006

Some Abstract Nonsense

Today I will be writing about something on Number Theory. Basically I just give an overview of the theory and knowledge from other fields of Mathematics that is required in the study (as much as I know of). Hence if you are not interested, do not read on anymore. I will not be responsible for any head injuries or damage caused while reading this article.

The study of number theory basically revolves over what we call integers. Since the objects we are studying has been identified, the next question will be how one determine whether two integers are equal. This is precisely the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic relating to the factorization of primes. The other important aspects is whether a given certain equation with integral cofficients has integral solution. One example of such equation is the Fermat's Last Theorem, where one asks if the equation x^{n} + y^{n} = z^{n} , where n is an integer greater or equal to 3, has integral solutions where none of x, y, z is zero. This statement looks simple but took Mathematicians about 300 years to finally to prove this (The final touch was by Andrew Wiles in around 1995). For the remainder of this article, I will briefly introduce to
you some parts of our "playground".

Algebraic Number Theory : This is the study of general number fields. A number field is a finite field extension over the rationals. Associated to each number field are algebraic invariants: the rings of integers, class group, unit group, residue field, discriminant etc. All these invariants give some form of arithmetic informations on the number fields. For example, the discriminant tells us about the so-called ramified primes. The rings of integers are examples of a Dedekind Domain which are rings having unique factorization of prime ideals. One of the standard approach to study a number field is to study its localization with respect to each prime ideals. This is useful since in its localization, we are only left with one prime to work with.
For instances in the base case, we have the p-adic integers and p-adic rationals. Also there is a topology on the localization given by a ultrametric, which gives a p-adic representation of the elements in the local field. Another tool that is also important in the study of number field is the Dedekind zeta function (which is a generalization of the zeta function). This function has a pole at 1 and its residue is related to class number and regulators of the number field (this is known as the class number formula).

Class Field Theory : The moral of this theory is that there is a relation between the arithmetic of a number field and its Galois extension. Another natural way (my personal feeling) to see this theory is as follow. The Gauss Quadratic Reciprocity Law (which one will learn in some elementary number theory course) in some sense determines the arithmetic of quadratic fields. Hence we are led to the question if there is similar of such law in a general number fields. The theory has been completely developed (between 1850 - 1925) for abelian number fields, i.e number fields which are Galois over the rational whose Galois group is abelian. The nonabelian case is still unsettled til today. In fact, the nonabelian theory has some relations to the so-called Langlands Program, which I will not dwell on it. There are two aspects of the theory, the Local Class Field Theory and the Global Class Field Theory. One final remark is that there is also generalization of the theory to other fields (function fields, higher local fields) other than number fields.

Homological Algebra : This evolved historically from Algebraic Topology where one is interested in studying the homology of certain (co)chain complexes. In the context of algebra, we are interested in the study of complexes in an abelian category (most important of all is the category of modules). In particular, if we restrict our extension to the category of modules over some group ring, we will obtain the so-called group cohomology theory. In number theory, we are interested in the case when the group is some Galois group of number fields or some other field of interest. We will say a bit on this in the next topic. Group Cohomology also provides an approach to the development of Class Field Theory. It also gives an cohomological interpretation of certain result in number theory (e.g Hilbert's Theorem 90).

Galois (Profinite) Cohomology : As we have remarked above, we are interested in the group cohomology when the group is a Galois group. Here we also deal with infinite Galois group and the group is not just an algebraic object, it also has a topology, given by the Krull topology or also known the profinite topology. Example of such groups are the Galois group of the algebraic closure of rationals (incidently the structure of this group is still unknown) or the Galois group of the maximal unramified extension outside a finite set of primes. These cohomology has a lot of arithmetic information encoded in it.

Algebraic K-Theory : This also evolved from Algebraic Topology in the study of vector bundles. In the case of rings, we have a list of invariant attached to a ring known as K_{i}(R). When the ring in consideration is a ring of integer, the zero K group is precisely the class group times a copy of the integer. The first K group is the unit group of the ring of integer. The second K group of a number field also has very interesting properties. For instance, it is isomorphic to the quotient of first Galois Cohomology with coefficient in (Q/Z)(2) by its maximal divisible sungroup (Frankly speaking, I have not fully understand this statement yet).

Unfortunately, my knowledge is still very limited. There is still areas like Iwasawa Theory, Elliptic Curves, Algebraic Geometry, Etale Cohomology et al which are currently just out of my grasp as yet. Also some of the topics I have above are not really fully exploited yet. Perhaps when I have learned more, I will come back to write a bit on these and expand some of the things I had written above. Finally thanks you for reading if you have read so far. I hope your brain is still in good shape...Don't worry too much, they are not examinable.

Saturday, April 15, 2006

New Glasses

I broke my spectacles frame today, so I went to the optician to see what can be done. The lady told me that because my lens is made of glass and is of the big size one (you people should know) and they only have the small size narrow type of frame. The only way to fix my lens into the frame is to cut it to the size of the frame. Unfortunally, they do not have the machine available to cut the glass lens and so if they sent for their workshop, it will take a week...

Luckily it turns out they have spare lens for me and so they made one for me on the spot, although the whole process cost me a few hundreds bucks (which pained my heart) and around two hours of waiting time for them to cut the plastic lens they have. I guess it is still okay since I can continue to work. Oh ya, they also say if you needed any slight adjustment of the glasses, you can just come back anytime and no extra charges will be made. The optician also advise me to see him every three months or so to "calliper" my eyes and glasses (free of charge too).

Hmmm, so maybe investing a few hundreds over a pair of spectacles is not too bad (and unavoidable for people like me). Enough is said, I should get back to work on my take-home exams.

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

color quiz

I just took a color quiz online...http://www.ColorQuiz.com/
My results are as below. It is quite accurate but not 100%. But still it saves me some work on writing something about myself :P
You may want to try it for some references or just for fun :)
------------------------------------------------------------
Your Existing Situation
Volatile and outgoing. Needs to feel that events are developing along desired lines, otherwise irritation can lead to changeability or superficial activities.

Your Stress Sources
Feels that life has far more to offer and that there are still important things to be achieved--that life must be experienced to the fullest. As a result, he pursues his objectives with a fierce intensity that will not let go of things. Becomes deeply involved and runs the risk of being unable to view things with sufficient objectivity, or calmly enough; is therefore in danger of becoming agitated and of exhausting his nervous energy. Cannot leave things alone and feels he can only be at peace when he has finally reached his goal.

Your Restrained Characteristics
Feels that he is receiving less than his share and that there is no one on whom he can rely for sympathy and understanding. Pent-up emotions and a certain egocentricity make him quick to take offense, but he realizes that he has to make the best of things as they are. Circumstances force him to compromise and to forgo some pleasures for the time being. Capable of achieving physical satisfaction through sexual activity.

Your Desired Objective
Seeks affectionate, satisfying and harmonious relationships. Desires an intimate union, in which there is a love, self-sacrifice and mutual trust.

Your Actual Problem
Needs to achieve a stable and peaceful condition, enabling him to free himself of the worry that he may be prevented from achieving all the things he wants.

Saturday, April 08, 2006

history again

This is in regards to a speech given by our Prime Minister about the need to educate young Singaporeans about our own history (especially the post 1965), which I have read from the web. Below is my rant...you are forewarned...:)

Personally, I agree with what was said. Most young Singaporean (including myself) has very little knowledge of our own roots. "Very little knowledge" could be an understatement, it could have been total oblivion. I guess this is especially highlighted during the recent demise of certain past political figures. Few youngsters, when interviewed, actually know of them or much lest even been aware of what contributions these people have made.

Singapore afterall had advanced from a Third World country to a First World country in barely less than half a century and I do not think this is something that just come from from nothing (although well in some aspects, this may be true). I am not just talking about the political figures but also those who had contribute to the any other aspects that brought Singapore to its today standing. Who were the ones responsible for making Changi airport to a renowed international airport? Who were the ones who made education accessible to all? Et al.

I guess it is good that steps had already been taken to introduce more of post 1965 history in syllabus. Chinese has a saying: 飲水思源. We should not forgot those who have made it possible for Singapore. For those who still have doubts over these people's contributions, I have a question for you. What had made it possible for me to write this and for you to read it?

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

2nd post

Haha, sorry if the first post looks too solemn...just a sudden urge to vent off some stream
anyway, this is my first blog....please feel free to comment or criticize.

Tuesday, April 04, 2006

First Post

I was reading about the history of Singapore from Wiki. After reading, I came to re-realize (I mean I know my history but upon reading, some of the thoughts return) that Singapore had gone through a lot to become what it is today.
For instances, how Sang Nil Utama found Singapore and gave the island the name Singapura meaning "lion city" in Sanskirt because he saw a lion; how Raffles reinstall the Sultan of Johor and in return, getting a grant to establish a trading post in Singapore; how Singapore fall during the Japanese invasion; how Singapore was expelled from Malaysia et al.
Strange how things seem to unfold. What will Singapore be named if Sang Nil Utama did not find the island? Will we ever still think that the British is not as infallible as we thought if Singapore did not fall during the invasion? Or will we still remain as docile servant to our British masters. Will we able to rise from a Third World country to a First World country as today if Malaysia did not expel us? Or we will have prospered more under Malaysian rule?
However, we can't go back to time, so we will never be able to find out the "what ifs". But today's sencerio is not independent of yesterday's and tomorrow future may vary on today's choices and events. Maybe things happened because they had to happen.
This reminds me of a phrase from an anime. "There is no such things as coincidences, there is only the inevitables".